Healthcare, reimagined.
One system runs the chart, the claim and the payment. Every claim is checked against the payer’s rules and priced before it goes out.
The film follows one illustrative claim, with synthetic data, through VAERION. 1. The visit: a clinician sees the patient, and the visit becomes data. 2. The chart: Axiom Scribe drafts the note from the visit, the diagnosis code E11.9 is attached, and the note is signed. 3. The check: three AI reviewers each vote on the code, the claim passes the payer’s rules, and VAERION predicts a payment of $158 to $186. That is an estimate, not payer approval. 4. Release: a person approves the claim, and it goes out to the payer. 5. The answer: the payer pays $172, inside the predicted range. The view then widens to many practices, all running on one system.
- DirectTrustEPCS Aggregator certified
- SurescriptsApproved e-prescribing, via ScriptSure
- AWSPHI stays inside, under a BAA
- NCCI1.7M+ official CMS edits checked
Healthcare runs on disconnected tools. Patients pay for it.
Each system keeps its own copy of the patient. Claims go out blind, and answers return weeks later.
See the platformOne spine, not a stack of tools.
One record, one accountable AI layer, and a workspace for every role.
Many systems, or one. 1. Five tools, five copies of the patient. They rarely agree. 2. VAERION keeps one record, from intake to remittance. 3. One AI layer reads that record, and every output cites its source. 4. Every seat works on the same record. Nothing is re-keyed. Illustrative, synthetic data.
One longitudinal record
Problems, medications, labs, notes and claims together, with your specialty configured on top.
Claim 4471, priced before it goes out. 1. Claim 4471 arrives as a standard 837P. Nothing new to produce. 2. Bundling, units and diagnosis validity are checked before it goes out. 3. The line is priced on the fee schedule in effect that day, and against this payer’s history. 4. Expected payment $172, range $158–$186, denial risk 2.4%. An estimate, not payer approval. 5. The payer pays $172. The remittance lands inside the predicted range. Illustrative, synthetic data.
The predicted EOB
See the expected payment range and denial risk before a claim goes out.
Axiom Code on encounter 4471. 1. Each reviewer reads the signed note, and only the signed note. 2. Three reviewers propose codes and cite the lines behind them. Every vote is shown. 3. Official edits gate the result. A failed edit holds the code. 4. The coder makes the call. No code is applied automatically. Illustrative, synthetic data.
Axiom Code
Three AI reviewers vote on each code. Official edits gate it. A coder decides.
An outside action, held at the gate. 1. A claim asks to leave for the payer. It has no authority yet. 2. The gate checks the evidence: clean edits, eligibility, enrollment and approval. 3. Two conditions are missing, so the claim is held. Blocked, not warned. 4. The route is enrolled and a person approves. Now it can run. 5. The decision is sealed into the hash-chained audit trail. Changing the past breaks the chain. Illustrative, synthetic data.
Evidence-gated actions
Payer sends, eRx and payments wait for accepted evidence. Every access is logged.
Schedule to paid, on one loop.
Every step reads the same record, and every payer answer informs the next claim.
Eligibility and prior auth, up front.
Real-time eligibility at booking and prior-auth detection. The front desk sees ready, or the exact blocker.
Drafted by Scribe. Signed by you.
Every drafted statement links to the recording. Nothing reaches the chart until the provider signs.
Three reviewers vote. You see each vote.
Failed edits are held. A coder makes the call.
Know the payment before you send.
Each line is priced against CMS fee schedules and the payer’s history. An estimate with sources, never a promise.
Denials, worked with evidence.
Remittances match automatically. Safe fixes apply themselves; coding or money changes wait for a person.
Measured, not promised.
RCM Engine benchmarks, published with how they were measured.
Prediction figures were measured out-of-fold on one urgent-care provider’s ~5-year de-identified claims history (17,463 insurance lines); the model calibrates to each provider’s own payers over time, so they are not a guaranteed rate. Grouper throughput: 20,000 claims on a single 2-vCPU container, zero errors.
Shaped to how you run.
The whole loop, run by a small team.
TodayHospital-level payer complexity, a fraction of the staff, and four systems that never agree.
With VAERIONOne record from intake to remittance, with your specialty configured on top. Wound care comes first.
One spine for every practice.
TodayEvery acquisition adds another EHR, billing vendor and portal.
With VAERIONEach practice runs as its own tenant on one spine, so a new site is configuration, not a new implementation.
Revenue intelligence beside your EHR.
TodayDenials and underpayments surface weeks after submission, across thousands of claims.
With VAERIONThe RCM Engine prices professional, outpatient and inpatient claims against official CMS rules through an API beside your EHR.
The whole patient, on one record.
TodayDental and medical findings live in separate charts. Cash-pay clinics run on spreadsheets.
With VAERIONThe Dental & Oral Wellness pack shares the medical record. VAERION Wellness brings the spine to cash-pay clinics.
Secure by construction.
Outside actions wait for evidence. Every access is provable.
Built first for specialty practices.
Specialty clinics and multi-site groups are onboarding now. The dental and wellness packs run on the same system, switched on for each practice.
- One record, intake to remittance
- AI that shows its evidence
- Outside actions need real authority
- A BAA before any PHI
See VAERION on your own claims.
A working session on your specialties, payers and workflows.